[RP TownTalk] Character Counts
Andrew Farrington
somefool at dvnt.com
Thu Mar 16 14:36:16 UTC 2006
Is it too late to save that gorgeous old house? I'm very into your ideas
and grateful for them, but I don't know if we actually have any options in
the matter. Do we?
Andrew Farrington
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 johnferg27 at aol.com wrote:
> I first learned of the benefit of an M-U-TC zone in the Fall of 2000
> when the threat of demolition of a major portion of the Route One
> corridor old buildings first loomed to be replaced with an Eckerd Drug
> Store. I tried to get the designation of the zone on a fast-track
> through County Councilmember Hendershot's office. He did not choose to
> move it along and, as you all know only too well, the buildings were
> torn down and you've been forced to tolerate a mess at that property
> since then. It appears you will eventually have a bank there AND it is
> because of the M-U-TC that you are able to place certain demands on the
> table in the way that bank is placed and designed.
>
> At no time did I ever understand that the M-U-TC zone was intended to
> expand and increase development within its boundaries. It's intent was
> explained to me then (and I have no reason to believe it has changed)
> that it gave the local government a stronger voice in keeping rehab and
> new development and in-fill development in keeping with what the local
> residents and government felt were compatible with the existing
> development.
>
> The proposed development at Dumm's Corner will remove a significant
> measure of the existing character of the town -- I'm not suggesting that
> character is Georgetown or Alexandria chic -- however, it is unique as a
> five (or four) story apartment building will not be. The present
> boarding house is a circa 1910 home -- would it not add to the town's
> character if it became a B & B with a dining room on the ground floor
> that would cater to guests and the public at large (just one
> possibility). Such a use could play off having the railroad crossing
> there. The former Credit Union is a circa 1930s-40s building and was
> occupied by the Ben Dyer Survey operation for decades. It can't be held
> up as an example of Frank Lloyd Wright architecture, but it is unique
> (art moderne) and could be developed into a store or restaurant wherein
> you would play off that characteristic.
>
> The foreward to the M-U-TC legislation states: "The intent of the zone
> [M-U-TC] is to provide more design flexibility, while promoting more
> compatible development for older communities" -- I do not read anything
> therein that calls for more intensive land use.
>
More information about the TownTalk
mailing list