[RP TownTalk] Traffic concerns

dominey at mris.com dominey at mris.com
Wed Jan 31 18:46:34 UTC 2007


Hello Riverdale Park neighbors. I live in Hyattsville on Queensbury Road and rush hour and weekend traffic has beeen and still growing into a nightmare issue. There is a lot of cut-through traffic, drivers do not heed signs, there are way too many (empty) buses traveling through this road that don't really service our residents and noise, dust and pollution are not minor issues either. Since the shopping mall added Target, traffic on my road must have at least doubled. Even on weekends now there are cars lined up for blocks down QB. With all this development happening both in Hyattsville and Riverdale Park, we need to look at ways to stem traffic volume. I know we all want smart, constructive development, but our officials don't seem to be concerned with the long term negative impact that some of the decisions - or lack thereof- will have on our communities, property values and quality of life. Unfortunately I cannot attend tonight's traffic meeting in College Park, but I ema
 iled Will Campos again (if I am not wrong, he is on the County's traffci committee) and I will contact Mr. Todd Turner with my concerns. Hyattsville and Riverdale Park ought to work together to find a solution for this situation.
Sandra Dominey

> 
> From: towntalk-request at riverdale-park.org
> Date: 2007/01/31 Wed AM 11:54:11 EST
> To: towntalk at riverdale-park.org
> Subject: TownTalk Digest, Vol 6, Issue 27
> 
> Send TownTalk mailing list submissions to
> 	towntalk at riverdale-park.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	towntalk-request at riverdale-park.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	towntalk-owner at riverdale-park.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TownTalk digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: After new condos are built- what about traffic?
>       (Alan Thompson and Sarah Wayland)
>    2. Fwd: [NUJ&P] Join in! County Transportation hearings:	this
>       Wed &Thurs 1/31, 2/1/2007 (Jonah Blaustein)
>    3. Re: After new condos are built- what about traffic? (Leslie Plant)
>    4. Re: After new condos are built- what about traffic?
>       (Dwight Holmes)
>    5. Re: After new condos are built- what about traffic?
>       (bruce.wernek at mindspring.com)
>    6. re  After new condos are built- what about traffic?
>       (Dwight Holmes)
>    7. Fwd:  MUTC Meeting Outcomes (Vernon Archer)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:22:49 -0500
> From: Alan Thompson and Sarah Wayland <twacks at his.com>
> Subject: Re: [RP TownTalk] After new condos are built- what about
> 	traffic?
> To: TownTalk <towntalk at riverdale-park.org>
> Message-ID: <bab6fa08c4e093c0d4f544648d2c5e03 at his.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> 
> [Sarah here.]
> 
> I agree completely that the intersection at Lafayette and Queensbury is  
> horrible, both for pedestrians and drivers.
> 
> I live north of East-West highway and between the RR tracks and the  
> river, and walking from our neighborhood to the train station and  
> business area at "Town Center" is really dangerous - there's no place  
> to cross to the west side of the street.
> 
> Driving isn't much more fun, which is why Sue has trouble walking the  
> same areas. At Lafayette & Queensbury, if you are heading north to  
> south on Lafayette (crossing Queensbury, instead of turning to go over  
> the tracks) people honk at you, or worse yet, ignore you. I used to  
> drive that stretch every morning to drop my child at daycare, and each  
> day felt I was taking my life in my hands.
> 
> At Rhode Island and Queensbury, drivers heading east on Queensbury  
> don't seem to understand that cars coming over the tracks don't have a  
> stop sign, and don't yield to them. Drivers coming over the tracks that  
> want to turn left to head south on Rhode Island run the risk of being  
> hit, if not by drivers who don't want to let them turn left, then by  
> the train!
> 
> It's an absolute nightmare.
> 
> Years ago I brought this to the attention of the Traffic Committee, who  
> agreed that the problem was bad. In the end, their advice was to take a  
> different route.
> 
> There was a plan, concocted nearly 15 years ago by MNCPPC, citizens,  
> and businesses in Riverdale, that advised closing off the section of  
> Lafayette that goes between the parking lot for the train station and  
> Mabel Munch Park. Lafayette would connect with Natoli Place (in front  
> of the large Victorian houses/apartments) and end on Queensbury,  
> forcing drivers to turn left or right on Queensbury. I still think this  
> proposal has merit.
> 
> We should again bring this issue (the dangerous nature of this  
> intersection) to the attention of the Traffic Committee (does it still  
> exist? If not, then to the Town Council), whether the condos go in or  
> not. I honestly think it's a matter of life or death, and I'm stunned  
> there haven't been more accidents in that area.
> 
> -Sarah
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Sue Collins wrote:
> 
> > Maybe this has been addressed and I just haven't seen
> > it, however; has much been said about how the extra
> > traffic which will result from all the new condos,
> > etc., being built in the area will be handled?  As it
> > is now, the traffic in the Dumms' Corner/Lafayette
> > Avenue/Queensbury Road area is a complete nightmare,
> > especially at rush hour, and if you add having to stop
> > for trains to that - whew!  If you're a full-time
> > pedestrian as I am, it's almost impossible to cross
> > Queensbury at Lafayette or over by S&J's to catch a
> > bus during rush hour.  People don't stop to let you
> > cross, and it seems most drivers don't use turn
> > signals...  Anyhow, enough complaining, are there
> > going to be plans to somehow handle the traffic during
> > and after the construction?   Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________ 
> > _____________
> > Need Mail bonding?
> > Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
> > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
> > _______________________________________________
> > TownTalk mailing list
> > To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
> > TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription  
> > processing only
> > http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
> >
> > For more information about Riverdale Park, visit  
> > http://www.ci.riverdale-park.md.us
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:38:15 -0500
> From: Jonah Blaustein <jonah at mindspring.com>
> Subject: [RP TownTalk] Fwd: [NUJ&P] Join in! County Transportation
> 	hearings:	this Wed &Thurs 1/31, 2/1/2007
> To: Town Talk <TownTalk at riverdale-park.org>
> Message-ID: <4D6244A2-B130-11DB-BDA4-000A9590718C at mindspring.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; delsp=yes; charset=WINDOWS-1252;
> 	format=flowed
> 
> This is late notice, but there is a transportation meeting tonight in  
> College Park. (See below) Concerns about handling traffic in this area  
> should be raised, especially related to the new condos.
> J
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Laurel Imlay <laurelimlay at erols.com>
> > Date: Tue Jan 30, 2007  12:49:43  PM US/Eastern
> > To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> > Subject: [NUJ&P] Join in! County Transportation hearings: this Wed  
> > &Thurs 1/31, 2/1/2007
> > Reply-To: Laurel.Imlay at SierraClub.org
> >
> > WHAT: Transportation, Housing and Environment Committee of the Prince
> > George's County Council PUBLIC hearings
> >
> > PURPOSE: This is an important opportunity for public input into the
> > Council's consideration of the annual County priorities list, as well  
> > as
> > the upcoming budget for Fiscal Year 2008. With limited State and  
> > Federal
> > transportation funds, it is important for the Council to hear our
> > citizens' priorities for reducing congestion, increasing mass transit,
> > improving roads, as well as trail, bike and pedestrian improvements.
> >
> >
> > LOCATIONS & DATES:
> > Wednesday January 31, 2007
> > City of College Park
> > City Hall ? Council Chamber
> > 4500 Knox Road
> > College Park, Maryland
> >
> >         Thursday February 1, 2007
> >         Town of Morningside
> >         Municipal Building
> >         6901 Ames Street
> >         Suitland, Maryland
> >
> > TIME: 7 PM
> >
> > SPEAKER REGISTRATION & INFO CONTACT: Mr. Todd M. Turner, Legislative  
> > Officer
> > 301-952-4116 tmturner at co.pg.md.us <mailto:tmturner%40co.pg.md.us>
> > speak 3 minutes max, bring 12 copies of any written testimony
> >
> > CORDIAL INVITATIONS FROM
> > Camille A. Exum, Chair
> > Prince George's County Council
> >
> > Thomas E. Dernoga, Chair
> > Transportation, Housing and Environment Committee
> > TEDernoga at co.pg.md.us <mailto:TEDernoga%40co.pg.md.us>
> >
> > Eric Olson,Vice Chair
> > Transportation, Housing and Environment Committee
> > <mailto:eolson at co.pg.md.us>eolson at co.pg.md.us  
> > <mailto:eolson at co.pg.md.us>
> >
> > --  
> >
> > Laurel Imlay
> > Sierra Club Maryland Chapter Staff
> > Suite 101A
> > 7338 Baltimore Ave.
> > College Park, MD 20740
> > 301-277-7111     301-277-6699fax
> > laurel.imlay at sierraclub.org
> > http://maryland.sierraclub.org/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> >      
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Neighbors_United_for_Justice_and_Peace/
> >
> > <*> Your email settings:
> >     Individual Email | Traditional
> >
> > <*> To change settings online go to:
> >      
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Neighbors_United_for_Justice_and_Peace/ 
> > join
> >     (Yahoo! ID required)
> >
> > <*> To change settings via email:
> >      
> > mailto:Neighbors_United_for_Justice_and_Peace-digest at yahoogroups.com
> >      
> > mailto:Neighbors_United_for_Justice_and_Peace- 
> > fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
> >
> > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >     Neighbors_United_for_Justice_and_Peace-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
> >
> > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> >     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:08:57 -0500
> From: "Leslie Plant" <soapmkr at erols.com>
> Subject: Re: [RP TownTalk] After new condos are built- what about
> 	traffic?
> To: "'TownTalk'" <towntalk at riverdale-park.org>
> Message-ID: <004101c74541$67318d80$f5662c42 at Leslie>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Sarah wrote:
> 
> >>There was a plan, concocted nearly 15 years ago by MNCPPC, citizens,  
> and businesses in Riverdale, that advised closing off the section of  
> Lafayette that goes between the parking lot for the train station and  
> Mabel Munch Park. Lafayette would connect with Natoli Place (in front  
> of the large Victorian houses/apartments) and end on Queensbury,  
> forcing drivers to turn left or right on Queensbury. I still think this  
> proposal has merit.<<
> 
> That is a good, creative idea.  
> 
> I also wonder sometimes if the corner by Dumms could be one-way going
> towards the mansion, at least during rush hour.  That way the traffic going
> over the tracks wouldn't be at risk from those cars running the stop-sign at
> the corner.
> 
> Leslie
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:53:25 -0500
> From: "Dwight Holmes" <dwightrholmes at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [RP TownTalk] After new condos are built- what about
> 	traffic?
> To: TownTalk <towntalk at riverdale-park.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<8123da3c0701310653s3d05e7dv8d320be3381c82bf at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> There are, indeed, going to be HUGE changes in terms of the amount and
> the flow of traffic in our town.  Assuming that the Dumm's Corner
> development comes to fruition, and that the old NOAA site (where
> Lafayette turns and flows through the parking lot over to Rivertech
> Court) also converts from an abandoned site into a high-density
> residential complex... and add to that the humongous plans starting to
> unfold for the entire campus area along Paint Branch and River
> Roads...
> 
> If the Dumm's Corner development goes through as currently proposed,
> it will be especially incumbent on the Town to marshall whatever
> resources and leverage are necessary to improve the flow of both
> pedestrian and vehicular traffic in this entire area starting *now* --
> if not, the risk is that potential buyers of these condos will take
> one look at the morning snarl of traffic and the unsafe conditions and
> say "No thanks."
> 
> A few obvious changes in store for us:
> 
> 1. Lafayette (north of Queensbury) will become a real, through street
> connecting via Rivertech Ct. to River Rd.  Many of us enjoy using this
> little secret passageway we have that gives us a very handy bypass to
> avoid the downtown College Park portion of Rt. 1.  It is as wonderful
> as it is partly because it is hidden from the world -- it doesn't show
> up on yahoo maps, google local, mapquest or any published map for that
> matter.  Despite its top secret classification, at rush hour there is
> quite a line of cars coming down Lafayette to Queensbury.  Once the
> development goes in at the NOAA site and the street is opened up, that
> will quickly become a major conduit feeding traffic into our Town
> Center.
> 
> 2. The proposed plan for Dumm's Corner has the entry/exit to the
> underground parking area on Queensbury Rd approximately opposite of
> Natoli Place -- the street that runs along the east side of Mabel
> Munch "Park".  If Lafayette right at Queensbury in front of the MARC
> station is closed as has been suggested (which may well make sense),
> then this new intersection of a rerouted Lafayette-onto-Natoli Place +
> the parking entrance for the Dumm's Corner garage @ Queensbury will
> suddenly become a busy intersection. With current rules, all traffic
> coming out of the garage onto Queensbury during the morning rush hour
> would be forced to make a left turn onto Queensbury, and feed into the
> already-confused and dangerous
> Lafayette/Queensbury/Rhode Island/RxR track Medusa-of-an-intersection.
> 
> 3. With EYA East (over 300 units), a new Dumm's Corner complex (120
> units) and the NOAA complex (??? units), it's a safe (and desireable)
> assumption that use of the MARC station will increase dramatically.  I
> use the MARC daily, and my walk from home on Riverdale Rd. to the
> station can certainly be an adventure even now -- especially if I'm
> running late and can already hear the train whistle blowing!  The only
> available painted crosswalk to get from Lafayette to the station is
> way over in front of S&J's -- hardly convenient. And as others have
> written already, few of the drivers are paying any attention to the
> pedestrians at this Medusa-of-an-intersection.
> 
> The town plan for Town Center envisions a pedestrian-friendly,
> high-density complex of residential, commercial, and public space.
> Right now, without a major intervention and redesign (as others in
> this thread have called for), it will be anything but pedestrian
> friendly.
> 
> One hopeful suggestion: The new high tech crosswalk on River Rd (that
> connects the College Park Metro to the federal buildings across the
> street) is wonderful.  Some kind of a sensor trips flashing lights
> that outline the crosswalk area when a pedestrian enters the zone. It
> seems to be a pretty effective means of actually getting the cars to
> stop for pedestrians (which is quite an accomplishment in these
> parts!).  Use of this technology along with carefully considered
> placement of pedestrian crosswalks could greatly enhance the safety of
> the area.
> 
> On 1/31/07, Leslie Plant <soapmkr at erols.com> wrote:
> > Sarah wrote:
> >
> > >>There was a plan, concocted nearly 15 years ago by MNCPPC, citizens,
> > and businesses in Riverdale, that advised closing off the section of
> > Lafayette that goes between the parking lot for the train station and
> > Mabel Munch Park. Lafayette would connect with Natoli Place (in front
> > of the large Victorian houses/apartments) and end on Queensbury,
> > forcing drivers to turn left or right on Queensbury. I still think this
> > proposal has merit.<<
> >
> > That is a good, creative idea.
> >
> > I also wonder sometimes if the corner by Dumms could be one-way going
> > towards the mansion, at least during rush hour.  That way the traffic going
> > over the tracks wouldn't be at risk from those cars running the stop-sign at
> > the corner.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:07:30 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
> From: bruce.wernek at mindspring.com
> Subject: Re: [RP TownTalk] After new condos are built- what about
> 	traffic?
> To: TownTalk <towntalk at riverdale-park.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<17752008.1170259650666.JavaMail.root at mswamui-billy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
> 	
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> The inference from this discussion is that the Dumm's development project (Pete's) is very close to approval.  Is this the case?
> 
> If not, what are the outstanding issues preventing the project from being approved.  I was anticipating some discussion on this topic since traffic is irrelevant if the project is nixed.  Can anyone articulate the differences between Pete's proposal and the earlier proposal from the Patriot Group?
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:36:15 -0500
> From: "Dwight Holmes" <dwightrholmes at gmail.com>
> Subject: [RP TownTalk] re  After new condos are built- what about
> 	traffic?
> To: TownTalk <towntalk at riverdale-park.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<8123da3c0701310836g4da95f42hb198396844955651 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> I think the subj line of this thread should be changed to "*Before*
> new condos are built - what about traffic?
> 
> Traffic was not discussed at the town meeting on Monday (parking was), though
> obviously a new residential/complex with 120 condos will have a huge
> impact on traffic in the town.  But traffic (pedestrian as well as
> vehicular) is clearly an issue already,
> whether or not the Dumm's Corner proposal is realized, as the early
> posts in this thread discussed.
> 
> Hopefully Rob and/or others in an official capacity will respond to
> your question. Having attended Monday's meeting, *my* sense is that a
> majority of the council (and a majority of residents and others who
> spoke at the meeting (many did not speak) are generally not only
> favorable, but enthusiastic about the project.
> 
> I gather there are many next steps -- the usual Byzantine process of
> various approvals from various levels and agencies of government.
> 
> Major outstanding issues that would require exemptions from the rules
> have to do with height of the buildings, height and lack of setback
> given close proximity to neighborhood houses, absence of public spaces
> and amenities, parking, and proximity to the railroad tracks.
> 
> On 1/31/07, bruce.wernek at mindspring.com <bruce.wernek at mindspring.com> wrote:
> > The inference from this discussion is that the Dumm's development project (Pete's) is very close to approval.  Is this the case?
> >
> > If not, what are the outstanding issues preventing the project from being approved.  I was anticipating some discussion on this topic since traffic is irrelevant if the project is nixed.  Can anyone articulate the differences between Pete's proposal and the earlier proposal from the Patriot Group?
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TownTalk mailing list
> > To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
> > TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription processing only
> > http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
> >
> > For more information about Riverdale Park, visit http://www.ci.riverdale-park.md.us
> >
> 
> 
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> NO "SURGE"
> NO "SACRIFICE"
> IMPEACH "THE DECIDER"
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> NO "SURGE"
> NO "SACRIFICE"
> IMPEACH "THE DECIDER"
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:54:08 -0500
> From: "Vernon Archer" <varcher at gmail.com>
> Subject: [RP TownTalk] Fwd:  MUTC Meeting Outcomes
> To: TownTalk <TownTalk at riverdale-park.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<f86ada2a0701310854m371cb7fdn198c2e05d679c71 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Dear neighbors,
> 
> For those who missed the meeting Monday night I'm forwarding MUTC Chair
> Alice Ewen Walker's recape of the current proposal.  Monday's presentation
> is basically the same that was presented to MUTC. Alice's report includes
> (in answer to Bruce's question) a summary of ways the current aplication has
> moved to respond to issues the town had with the Patriot Group's proposal of
> a year ago.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Vern
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Alice Ewen Walker < alice.ewen.walker at gmail.com>
> Date: Dec 7, 2006 1:04 PM
> Subject: [RP TownTalk] MUTC Meeting Outcomes
> To: Dwight Holmes < dwightrholmes at gmail.com>
> Cc: TownTalk <towntalk at riverdale-park.org>
> 
> Town Talkers,
> 
> Last night the M-UTC committee met with Pete and Sons (owners of
> Dumms) to review their new application for redevelopment of properties
> at Queensbury / Lafayette / Riverdale Rd. (the properties where the
> boarding house, convenience store/sub shop, and credit union building
> are now located.)
> 
> As with the previous development proposed by Patriot Group, the
> redevelopment does not meet the M-UTC guidelines on a few very major
> points: building height, setback, and parking.  Those are standards
> that are mandatory, which the zoning committee has no legal ability to
> waive. The county, in consulatation with town council, does have that
> authority through the 'special exception' process.
> 
> The M-UTC voted to approve the project subject to it securing permits
> from the county through the special exception process. In essence,
> this means the zoning committee approved everything that we have the
> authority to approve and now the proposal passes to the county to
> secure those big exceptions. The county will consult w/ the town in
> this review.
> 
> It is really up to the town's elected body, reportable to voters, to
> determine major variations from the zoning -- such as building height.
> 
> (In my view, building height is the only big issue on the table.  The
> variance needed for setbacks is reasonable - it allows them to build
> closer to the train tracks than current county codes now allow, but is
> consistent with our historic build to lines. The parking variance is
> minor.)
> 
> About the project -
> 
> The proposal we saw reflected effort by the applicant to incorporate
> many of the comments the committee and public provided during the
> Patriot Group's earlier application process. Several of the
> concessions/improvements that were made in this application are:
> - 4 stories rather than 5 on the building on the south side of Riverdale Rd.
> - use of quality materials and articulation on all faces of the
> building, including the courtyard/back sides
> - more surface level parking to serve retail businesses
> - no net loss of retail space. this version of the project provides
> about twice the retail area as what the Patriot Group had proposed.
> - effort made to minimize the roof profile
> - a two phase building process that will allow the owners to continue
> to operate their businesses with no shut down and no loss of these
> valued businesses to the town.
> - larger unit sizes to the residential units than what was previously
> proposed
> 
> While there are some details that are still pending regarding interior
> amenities, landscaping and other features, these are things that the
> applicant has stated will be in compliance with the M-UTC guidelines.
> 
> At this point, the applicant is going to move with all haste to submit
> for the special permit and get a decision about whether the project
> will be granted an exception or not.
> 
> If you have opinions about the project (in favor or not), the most
> appropriate thing to do is to review the plans at town hall and get in
> touch with your council person. You may also want to talk to the folks
> at Dumm's Corner, who would like to keep the lines of communication
> open and would rather have a chance to answer/address concerns now
> than later.
> 
> Many thanks to the Spiropoulos family and their architecture team for
> a thorough and straight forward presentation of the project last
> night.
> 
> Alice Ewen Walker
> M-UTC Committee Chair
> _______________________________________________
> TownTalk mailing list
> To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
> TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription processing
> only
> http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
> 
> For more information about Riverdale Park, visit
> http://www.ci.riverdale-park.md.us
> 
> 
> -- 
> Vernon Archer, Mayor
> Town of Riverdale Park, Maryland
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20070131/86ad3993/attachment.html 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TownTalk mailing list
> TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
> http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
> 
> For more information about Riverdale Park, visit http://www.ci.riverdale-park.md.us
> 
> End of TownTalk Digest, Vol 6, Issue 27
> ***************************************
> 



More information about the TownTalk mailing list