[RP TownTalk] 711

[douglagrl at verizon.net]

Thank you for the information. I will review the links. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 7, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Alan K. Thompson <akthompson at riverdaleparkmd.gov> wrote:
> 
> The decision letter sent by the MUTC committee in December is available (for the moment, but probably not forever) at 
> 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/lr1okz21kiqq7fv/20141209FinalSigned711DecisionLetter.pdf?dl=0
> 
> Starting on page 4 of the document are the Mandatory Standards from the MUTC "Black book," which are the architectural standards that the Planning Board must consider.  An excerpt of the actual standard is in the 3rd column, and the Committee's analysis of whether it was met or not is in the "Notes" column.  The Committee is working now to evaluate the updated plans against those same standards, as many of the issues identified in the Committee's recommendation in December have been addressed (for instance: there is no monument sign in the current plans).
> 
> There are also findings that the Planning Board must make in order to approve a plan that does not meet the Mandatory Standards, which are detailed on page 66 of the Black Book.
> 
> The Black Book is available at 
> 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/x920xperfn0t1jo/MUTCBook2004APPROVEDExceptBigMaps.pdf?dl=0
> 
> This version of the Black Book doesn't include a few big maps that increase the size of the document by more than 100 MB.  This link is also not guaranteed to last forever.
> 
> I hope this helps!
> 
> Alan Thompson
> Chair, Riverdale Park M-U-TC Local Design Review Committee, a.k.a. "the M-U-TC Committee"
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, <douglagrl at verizon.net> wrote:
>> As someone who is not familiar with the technical aspects of these types of applications, what is an example of a technical reason/opposition? What are some of the factors that the planning board would consider to make this application a 'positive' to our community?  Thanks.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> > On Jun 7, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Jonathan Ebbeler <jebbeler at efusionconsulting.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Not liking a 7-11 or using the fact there are other ones in the vicinity is not a basis from which an application can be opposed. If it's allowed, which a 711 is, there has to be technical reasons to disallow an application. The planning board as a matter of law cannot and will not consider comments that do not pertain to the identification of technical oppositions to an application.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > TownTalk mailing list
>> > To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
>> > TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription processing only
>> > http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
>> >
>> > For more information about Riverdale Park, visit http://www.riverdaleparkmd.info
>> _______________________________________________
>> TownTalk mailing list
>> To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
>> TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription processing only
>> http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
>> 
>> For more information about Riverdale Park, visit http://www.riverdaleparkmd.info
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20150607/bf60d142/attachment.html>