[RP TownTalk] FW: Public Service
bob smith
sfmc68 at verizon.net
Mon May 16 02:20:13 UTC 2016
Interesting, I do not have a recollection of seeing the message dated 28
April, with the 09:49 time stamp and I do not have it in any of my folders.
Thus I conclude I never saw it.
Thank you for this note and the link to the message in question and the
feed.
sincerely,
bob smith
On 5/2/16 7:38 PM, Jonathan Ebbeler wrote:
> The message was being held due to the number of recipients. Please read
> below
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Ebbeler
> *Sent:* Monday, May 2, 2016 7:35 PM
> *To:* 'varcher at riverdaleparkmd.gov' <varcher at riverdaleparkmd.gov>; Alan
> K. Thompson <akthompson at riverdaleparkmd.gov>; 'David J. Lingua'
> <djlingua at riverdaleparkmd.gov>; 'Christopher Henry'
> <chenry3240 at verizon.net>; 'crichardson at riverdaleparkmd.gov'
> <crichardson at riverdaleparkmd.gov>; 'Alejandro Silva'
> <alejandro.silva.1955 at gmail.com>; 'towntalk at riverdale-park.org'
> <towntalk at riverdale-park.org>
> *Cc:* 'Chief David Morris' <dmorris at riverdaleparkmd.gov>; 'LEONARD
> ADDISON' <laddison at riverdaleparkmd.gov>; 'Sara Imhulse'
> <simhulse at riverdaleparkmd.gov>; Jessica Barnes <jbarnes at riverdaleparkmd.gov>
> *Subject:* Public Service
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> All
>
>
>
> Whenever there is major news, I like many of you, wonder what the real
> story is. I have always prided myself in 5 years of being in office of
> welcoming dialogue, being impartial, open, transparent, and never pulled
> any punches. No one had to guess where I was on an issue or the reasons
> behind it. I was always willing to jump in the fray to provide
> information, to debate, to listen, and to adjust my position.
>
>
>
> When I turned in my paperwork to serve a third term last year, I didn’t
> sign up for what came my way including the Mayor refusing to administer
> the Oath of Office to me two days after my daughter was born, or the
> latest failed attempt to declare the seat vacant and the Mayor’s
> admitted extensive lobbying efforts to remove me. I did not sign up for
> a mid-term structural change in government that moves the Mayor from an
> observer to an active voting member who by representing everyone
> represents no one and removes his responsibility for the current
> financial and budget issues.
>
>
>
> Let me be abundantly clear on one point, this is not a matter of sour
> grapes. I have said from the start that I have nothing against the form
> or structure of government, just in how it is being slammed down the
> throats of the town and with recent disclosures by the Mayor answers the
> ‘why now’ and ‘why this way’ questions many of us asked from the start.
> I fervently respect the democratic process and traditions in that even
> if I vote against something and am in the minority I move past it
> without holding political vendettas. I am fine being the sole minority
> vote against the structure and I would have no issues if there was a
> more thoughtful approach towards the legislation.
>
>
>
> It is deeply troubling that the legislation never made its way into the
> Legislative Committee. We have standing committees to deal with issues
> like this so that information is presented, shared, discussed, and
> refined. Bypassing standing committees defeats the due process reason
> they exist in the first place. It is also unprofessional and
> disrespectful to the deliberative body as a whole.
>
>
>
> Fundamentally, beyond moving the Mayor into a voting role on Council, it
> does one core and primary thing – it buries the responsibility the Mayor
> currently has for the financial matters in town. The Mayor’s Executive
> Order, that had no legal basis according to our Charter, was premised on
> a supposed ‘fact’ that turned out to be less than truthful; our taxable
> base for FY17 is higher than it was in FY15 due to the overall aggregate
> growth in tax assessments in town . The truth we continue to ignore is
> that we are running a structural deficit and balance our budget on
> phantom one-time revenue items like bond proceeds we may or may not
> collect while ignoring our long-term under/unfunded Pension and OPEB
> liabilities of $3mil. It was disappointing to be removed as a Pension
> Trustee after bringing to light our significant liabilities despite
> being the only Councilmember with professional experience in this field.
>
>
>
> I am ok with losing a vote, having seats taken away from me etc.; I am
> not ok with being part of an organization that shifts blame of a
> financial situation from whom the law says is responsible, the Mayor and
> Council, onto professional staff that have no legal responsibility. I
> am not ok serving in a position where requested information is
> obfuscated. Knowing about, and not disclosing a financial situation for
> months, and introducing legislation that by its merits shifts who the
> finger gets pointed at for financial troubles is fundamentally not how
> leaders lead. They Mayor and Council are solely responsible for the
> budget, not professional staff. If we created the problem, we should
> fix this. The reason and rationale behind ‘why’ we need to do this are
> specious. The Town Administrator is already, by law, our Chief
> Operating Officer. The Mayor should have allowed her to do her job and
> not micro-managed the day-to-day operations. The Mayor should have done
> what our Charter requires, and paid more attention to the Mayoral
> responsibility of the financial management of the town than passing
> legislation that creates an inherent scapegoat.
>
>
>
> I am, however, not ok having my reputation impugned through no fault or
> actions of my own. During the Jey’s Auto legislation, the Mayor hid
> information from Council and reported to the public that despite his
> best attempts to negotiate a deal, the land owner refused to either
> accept our offer or provide a counteroffer. The landowner, during a
> meeting when this was reported, got to his feet and called us all
> liars. He is right. Council was lied to, the public was lied to, Jey
> was lied to. Jey negotiated and very fairly countered $650k to our
> $500k. Real Estate agents are required by law to present every offer
> made to their clients, it was troubling that the Mayor made a unilateral
> decision that because our offer was not accepted, decided that no
> counteroffer needed to be disclosed, going even further to claim none
> was made; until of course we were all called liars.
>
>
>
> It is deeply troubling that despite a clear policy directive and five
> years later, through 4 unanimous votes on Resolutions/Ordinances in
> 2011-2013, the Mayor has yet to implement what the vote required –
> acquisition of the land. This is, of course, a policy choice. We can
> have a brand new Town Hall or we can act to do something about derelict
> properties. We cannot do both without a significant tax hike.
>
>
>
> It is troubling that although I did what was required by the law in
> terms of getting resolution after resolution passed, the Town Hall
> process did not follow the law. Resolution 2009-R-10 required a
> committee be created to evaluate the possibility and potential of this
> expansion and draft a report with consensus opinions for Council by May
> 2010 with vetted options, locations, etc. Public Hearings were held,
> but staff can produce no such report. We have proceeded forward blindly
> since then. We did however, move very quickly in 2010 to put the policy
> of rebuilding Town Hall into motion; if only the same expediency was
> supported by the Mayor on Jey’s Auto maybe Riverdale Park would not be
> the only major municipality without significant redevelopment on the
> Route 1 corridor. It is quite frankly embarrassing that a municipal
> building that costs millions is a bigger priority than improving the
> economic health of our town.
>
>
>
> For me however, the final decision came when I read through a lawsuit
> filed against the town last week by Gregs Towing. In it, there were
> significant accusations of unfair business dealings and overt charges of
> racism. The local business and procurement legislation I authored, was
> created and implemented to avoid this exact situation. We just settled
> one lawsuit with Gregs Towing. I cannot and will not be associated with
> a town government where charges of racism are made. I want to be judged
> through the actions and deeds of myself, not those of an administration
> I have some significant concerns with and no longer trust.
>
>
>
> Moreover, the Mayor and CM Thompson met with UMD officials without any
> professional courtesy to inform or invite me to a meeting that has clear
> implications to my role as Chair of Economic Development. Despite the
> obvious policy differences with the Mayor, I have always routinely kept
> the Mayor and all members of the Economic Development Committee and
> Council informed as to progress being made. I sincerely hope that the
> town does not lose potential deals that are 100% lined up at this point,
> just requiring the town to say yes to grant requests for monies already
> appropriated in our current budget:
>
> 1) Bikram Yoga wishes to expand to take up 100% of the 2^nd Floor
>
> 2) Town Center Market wishes to expand and improve their Patio for
> seating
>
> 3) Janish Brewery wishes to open a Brewpub at Town Center
>
>
>
> These are deals and relationships I have worked hard to make happen over
> the last few years, there is nothing for the town to do further other
> than to say yes to the grant requests. Please do so in this budget year.
>
>
>
> Every decision, every vote, every policy, every piece of legislation
> written was done so with the interests of the town in mind. I have
> always tried to do the right thing despite any disagreements. In the 5
> years I have been on Council, there has been a significant change in the
> trajectory of the town for the better. That being said, it is time for
> some fresh people and ideas and this doesn’t mean a Councilman Archer or
> Mayor Thompson. It is obvious to me, with the lack of direct engagement
> by CM Thompson on his legislation, and the continued dismantling of most
> of the things the Mayor knows I care about, that my effectiveness would
> be limited at best for the next year.
>
>
>
> I have no interest in sitting in a seat to keep a title. I sat in the
> seat to make a difference, to change policy, to change the direction of
> the town. When the legislation I authored is being reversed and with
> little hope of being supported on future efforts, I would prefer to
> focus my energies on things that matter to my businesses, my family, and
> other organizations I support rather than beat my head against the wall
> for the sake of calling myself a Councilman. I sincerely hope that
> those interested in public service come out and challenge for the seats
> next May. I have enjoyed my time serving the Town of Riverdale Park but
> my wife and I have decided to move onto bigger challenges elsewhere.
>
>
>
> Effective 8pm EST on 2 May 2016 I resign the seat of Councilman, Ward 1
> of the Town of Riverdale Park.
>
>
>
> The Honorable Jonathan W. Ebbeler
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TownTalk mailing list
> To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
> TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription processing only
> http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
>
> For more information about Riverdale Park, visit http://www.riverdaleparkmd.info
>
More information about the TownTalk
mailing list