<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">Roland, </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">I didn't mean to be inflammatory. In fact I was trying to use an obviously exaggerated response to make my point a little less painless for you, but I will spell it out for you. If you are going to persist in complaining about the problems in Riverdale then I want to know what it is you propose that we do about those problems. Can we just get a straight answer from you? Or are you going to continue to simply complain about the way things are, and then be evasive about what you propose we should do about resolving them? Refusing to respond because I am being inflammatory is just a way of dodging the fact that you don't have an answer. </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">I used to work with a woman like that years ago. No matter what the teams suggestion was, her response was always the same: "That won't work." OK, why won't _(whatever)_ work? "It just won't. It won't work." Then what do you suggest instead? "I don't know, but your idea won't work..." I think you all get the idea. Eventually we concluded that she was more concerned with sabotaging our efforts than she was with assisting to make things better for everyone, and we got rid of her.</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">One more time: You want the rose vendors and yard sales shut down. What actions are you proposing that we take to accomplish your goal?<BR><BR>Paul<BR><BR>----- Original Message ----<BR>From: Roland Walker <A href="mailto:walker@pobox.com" target=_blank rel=nofollow ymailto="mailto:walker@pobox.com"><FONT color=#0000ff>walker@pobox.com</FONT></A><BR><BR>Paul,<BR>This is too inflammatory for me. I'm not going to respond.<BR>R<BR><BR>On 11/2/07, Paul Richards <<A href="mailto:paulric@yahoo.com" target=_blank rel=nofollow ymailto="mailto:paulric@yahoo.com"><SPAN class=yshortcuts id=lw_1194032972_0><FONT color=#0000ff>paulric@yahoo.com</FONT></SPAN></A>> wrote:<BR><BR>> Thanks for clarifying that Roland. We now have a "what". Now we need to work<BR>> on a "how".<BR>><BR>> Again, how are you proposing that we shut them down? Lynch all rose
vendors<BR>> on sight? Or maybe just a little side swipe as we drive past to "teach them<BR>> a lesson"?<BR>><BR>> What is it that you are proposing that we actually do?<BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message ----<BR>> From: Roland Walker:<BR>> What I propose to do about rose vendors and permanent yard sales is to shut<BR>> them down. They are already illegal. The rose vendors in particular are a<BR>> safety hazard to drivers.<BR></DIV></DIV></div></body></html>