<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>The Town Council passed a motion to send a letter of support for the Purple Line a few months ago. Attached is the text of the letter with the positions the town is officially supporting (I don't have the letterhead copy). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Basically, the River Road station location is not yet settled, and the Town is advocating to place the station at the corner of Rivertech Court and River Road.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>BRT is bus rapid transit and LRT is light rail transit. The town is advocating for the High Investment LRT option, but with a caveat - instead of tunneling under the park (which, as Alan mentioned, the project planners seemed to consider prohibitively expensive) we are advocating for an aerial structure over the Kenilworth/410 intersection. The medium investment LRT would cross the intersection at grade, and the Council felt that would have a serious traffic impact at an already crowded intersection. We are also advocating for a redesign of the intersection and station design that would improve pedestrian access. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards,</DIV>
<DIV>Kate Sharpe</DIV>
<DIV>Councilwoman, Ward 2<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Alan K. Thompson <twacks@gmail.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> dlynch@garretroomstudios.com<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> TownTalk <towntalk@riverdale-park.org><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Saturday, April 11, 2009 8:13:23 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: [RP TownTalk] map of the proposed purple line<BR></FONT><BR>I attended a WMATA presentation to the Town Council on the Purple Line as it would pass through Riverdale Park. WMATA seemed pretty sure that the "High Investment" version would NOT happen, or at least not on the Riverdale Park portion of the line. The "high investment" version was much, much more expensive, and also had (as I remember, I haven't checked notes) more environmental impact and legal hurdles to clear. So, yes, it's possible, but I think just
barely.<BR><BR>Alan<BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Don Lynch <SPAN dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:dlynch@garretroomstudios.com" target=_blank rel=nofollow ymailto="mailto:dlynch@garretroomstudios.com">dlynch@garretroomstudios.com</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">Well, Dwight is probably right in that a dotted line in engineering terms<BR>means a hidden route, ie underground. Which also means either choice is<BR>possible since cost is just one factor in this proposal.<BR><FONT color=#888888><BR>Don</FONT><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></div><br>
</body></html>