Sarah is correct -- under the "Tax Increment Financing" weve been discussing, a portion of the increased revenues from the development would pay for part of the bridge. This and much more will be discussed at the meeting tonight.<br>
<br>Alan<br><br>On Monday, January 9, 2012, Lou King <<a href="mailto:lking@knob.com">lking@knob.com</a>> wrote:<br>> That is the way I read Archer's comment too Sarah, but that's me.<br>><br>> I did notice that the Post article mention the Cafritz's "blitz" and the "grass-roots" campaign apposed. By not mentioning that there are Riverdale Park/UP/CP residents that favor the development, the article could be read as just a corporate vs the little guy situation. Like most single news sources, a fully balanced picture is often the victim of space and rush to deadline.<br>
><br>> Lou<br>> O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop HTML mail - <a href="http://www.asciiribbon.org">www.asciiribbon.org</a><br>><br>> Sarah Wayland wrote, On 1/9/2012 11:57 AM:<br>>><br>>> I read that as saying that the tax increment fund would only be on<br>
>> revenue generated by the development.<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> TownTalk mailing list<br>> To post to the list, send mail to <a href="mailto:TownTalk@riverdale-park.org">TownTalk@riverdale-park.org</a><br>
> <a href="mailto:TownTalk-request@riverdale-park.org">TownTalk-request@riverdale-park.org</a> is for automated subscription processing only<br>> <a href="http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk">http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk</a><br>
><br>> For more information about Riverdale Park, visit <a href="http://www.riverdaleparkmd.info">http://www.riverdaleparkmd.info</a><br>>