<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Sue –<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>While I do not consider myself a politician per se as an elected official I would be happy to weigh in on the subject (although my opinion carries no weight on the subject given this is a state issue). <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>From some of the threads I see that people are curious why this is such a hot topic this election cycle and we are left to wonder about the potential nefarious reasons behind this. In my opinion it is about money yes but not from the sources you suspect and not from the elected officials. If you have noticed most EOs have stayed well out of the fray. Opinions have been few and far between. There are two sources pro and con on this issue:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>-MGM Grand (pro)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>-Other Gaming Establishments primary WV (con)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The issue has been dressed up in a variety of different ways, i.e. arguing it will hurt or help schools etc. Fundamentally though this comes down to a lot of money being pumped into ads from people who have no interest or tie to Maryland, they just realize if this is built that they stand to lose. I do not agree that they will necessarily be hurt – unless they are offering an inferior product. We talk about free market economics and here is the perfect example. If the WV casinos were offering an equal or better casino than what is to be built at National Harbor it should not experience a loss in the customer base. What the opposition is asking for is protectionist regulation wrapped up in commercials pretending to care about Maryland or Maryland education – they don’t. They care about their Profit and Loss statement and it is more expensive to compete in an open free market than it is to confuse voters on what they are really voting on.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>On the flip side, I am not a huge proponent of gambling. I personally do not gamble outside of buying the occasional lottery ticket. I disagree with those however that base their comments on the fact that gambling becomes a regressive tax on the poor. The way the bill was structured forces MGM Grand to invest 700mil into a casino. This is substantial, incredibly substantial, which is why the competition in WV is flooding the Maryland market with money trying to defeat it. Ultimately they know that MGM will present a tremendous offering and they will be forced to step up their game if they want to compete…….OR spend a few million on television ads telling people how bad a new establishment will me (and yes of course still come to WV to gamble).<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I base some of my opinion in real experience. One of our clients owns the Atlantis down in the Bahamas. They are the 2<sup>nd</sup> largest employer next to the government. In bad times they employ around 7k people and when the economy is going well 10-11k. And yes many of these jobs are service-based jobs at the lower wage-scales. What I have found distasteful in the discussion thus far was people denigrating that employment. I have the utmost respect for people who get up every day and earn an honest day’s pay regardless of their pay. What people have not talked about is the incredible upward mobility in organizations like this. Because of the relatively large concentration of jobs there is enormous mobility upwards and in other areas. Basically once an employee proves that they are capable and dependable they have numerous opportunities available to them. Organizations like this trust proven commodities within their own walls before they look to hire on the outside. So yes, someone may come in making minimum wage cleaning rooms, but a year later they could be supervising a shift, or in another area altogether. Ten years later they could be making six figures in management. I worked with numerous people where this was how they got to where they were.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>While I am not a huge cheerleader of the MGM Grand, or other large intuitions like this, I am a fan of job creation. On a very fundamental level I am a fan of providing people with opportunity The National Harbor was created to be an entertainment and convention destination. It needs another draw like the upscale casino/entertainment venue that MGM Grand will build. Is it a perfect solution – absolutely not, but I am also not going to be swayed by WV casinos with selfish interests asking people to vote against their own self-interest. Everyone claims to love the free market – let’s see it at work and have WV and Atlantic City compete against what is built in National Harbor, not kill it because of protectionist policies.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Just my 2 cents for what it is worth.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>