<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>@Dwight – although the discussions are not yet finalized concerning alignment, I think a fair assessment would be that the town will almost assuredly gain greater ROW than what exists now. Since there will be a landing from the bridge and a road over to Rivertech and those will be public/town roads, RP stands to increase its land holdings. That being said, nothing would prevent a future government 30-50 years from now from selling or developing any land the town owns. Projects like Cafritz as well as the development of Route 1 and Kenilworth will make it much less likely for there ever to be a financial need for future governments to contemplate changes in land use for town-owned property. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>@Audrey – I will respectfully disagree with the assertion that the land parcel was properly zoned. R55 (single family housing) is a place-holding zone that is used extensively for both undeveloped and under-developed parcels since it forces owners to go through amendment processes that lets the planning board evaluate the merits and quality of a development proposal. It is instructive to note several facts, mixed-use development is the prevalent rule NOT the exception along the Route 1 Corridor. Other land parcels that are currently zoned R55 include the Postal Distribution Center and the Army Reserve Center. The last time zoning was looked at en masse in our area was in the late 1980s to around 1992/1993 with the codified 1994 Master Plan for Area 68. Keep in mind this was about the same time of the Green Line’s expansion to College Park. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Prior to the 2004 Amendment for the RP Mixed-Use Town Center, properties such as Greg’s Auto and were zoned I-1(light Industrial) that included uses allowed as a matter of right of a Car Wash, Bus Depot, Towers and Poles up to 175’, Commercial Fuel Depot, Septic Tank Service, Taxidermist, and a host of manufacturing and other uses. The point of the list is to indicate that zoning is not set in stone and should not be as areas change over the decades.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>To the other point concerning “changing the flavor,” I would again respectfully disagree with you concerning what would happen if the site had been developed as single family houses slammed in on 6500 sq. ft. lots. It is incredibly likely that the entire site would have been clear cut from the start. The infrastructure (stormwater management, water, gas, sewer, electricity, streetscape, sidewalks) required site-wide for a subdivision build-out necessitates this. While the streets may be tree-lined after the fact, so will the Cafritz site, along with the preservation of some of the 50+ year old specimen trees. This site has trees 30-40’ on center on all the roads as well as acreage left green and devoted to on-site stormwater management. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>An economic point concerning single-family development is that if the town had allowed it, as was proposed back in Mayor Ferguson’s era, everyone’s taxes would have gone up to subsidize the development. The town’s share of taxes based on single-family housing development does not support the cost of expanded services; in a mixed-use development pattern site-generated tax revenue more than covers the cost of the expansion of services. More to the point it provides local retail and commercial opportunities thus limiting CO2 and other emissions required of those of us having to get into cars to enjoy one of the country’s worst commuting experience. If air quality and environmental concerns are not just talking points, then they have to be addressed locally and not continually create live/work situations that necessitate automobile travel.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Respectfully,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Jonathan<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#000040'>Jonathan W. Ebbeler | </span></b><b><span style='font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Councilman Ward 1</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>