[RP TownTalk] Fences - the tall and the short of it

[Jennifer Gerwig]

They way it is worded in the Crier article you would not have to worry about pre-existing fences.  They can even be replaced in their original non-conforming glory within a set time frame.  That's the way I took it anyway.  
   
  I second your strongly felt opinion that side and back yard fences should be allowed to be the same height and that the height should not be forced to be less than 6 feet.  

Andrew Farrington <somefool at dvnt.com> wrote:
  Thanks.

For my part, I strongly feet that side yard and back yard should be 
considered the same, and that 6-foot fences are appropriate for them.

Is this going to affect existing fences?

-Andrew Farrington
4605 Queensbury Road


On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Dwight Holmes wrote:

> Andrew, in this case a picture is worth a thousand words: front, side, 
> and back yard fences are illustrated in the proposal itself: 
> http://www.ci.riverdale-park.md.us/Misc/2006/09/Chap-66-Fences-Hedges-v8-crier.pdf
>
>
> On 10/18/06, Andrew Farrington wrote:
>> 
>> I'm really not at all sure I understand the distinction between "side 
>> yard" and "back yard" fences. Where does the "side yard" end, and the 
>> "back yard" begin?
>> 
>> Also, is this going to affect existing fences?
>> 
>> -Andrew Farrington
>> 4605 Queensbury Road
>> 
>
_______________________________________________
TownTalk mailing list
To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription processing only
http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk

For more information about Riverdale Park, visit http://www.ci.riverdale-park.md.us


 		
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20061018/407192ca/attachment-0003.html>