[RP TownTalk] Traffic
Euniverz at aol.com
Euniverz at aol.com
Sat Aug 11 15:24:27 UTC 2007
Kathy,
You are indeed not alone. I am a town resident that uses the streets that
are being closed in order to get to work and paid taxes to pave those streets
too. As a town resident I also resent the prospect of having to go over
speed bumps twice a day during my commute, reducing my speed by 50 or 60% of the
posted speed, multiplied by the number of speed bumps on my route, which is
48th to queensbury to lafayette to river, each and every work day. That's
additional wear and tear on my car and increases my fuel consumption. It
seems like this new traffic pattern is trying to encourage me, a town resident,
to get off the town's streets altogether and join the through traffic on EW
and Kenilworth.
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: kathy galleher <kgalleher at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [RP TownTalk] Traffic
To: towntalk at riverdale-park.org
Message-ID: <806325.96202.qm at web51607.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have a thought about the traffic issue, and I realize I may have a
minority opinion, but I'd just like to express it in this forum. I am all for
enforcing safety via stop sign enforcement and speed enforcement. However, I
don't support changing street access to limit traffic, such as closing streets to
decrease traffic or installing speed bumps that force you to travel 10 mph
below the posted limit in order to navigate them. I see the streets as
public, and everyone has a right to choose which public roads they travel on and at
what time of day.
I have been disheartened to notice an increase in the number of public
streets, paid for by tax payer money, which are essentially "privatized" by
making them "No Entry" at certain times of day. I believe those streets belong to
all of us, not just those who live on them. It also seems like it is usually
higher income neighborhoods who are accorded the right to regulate traffic
out of their neighborhood. On an individual basis, I certainly understand the
frustration, but collectively I don't think such solutions work for the good
of everyone.
My latest frustration is that I have a morning yoga class in University
Park. A few months ago, all the streets I used to travel to the class were
closed to entry until 9:30 am. So I am now forced to either risk a ticket or
risk being rear-ended on 410 as I try to slow and make a turn. I don't like it.
Instead of closing off increasing numbers of side streets, it would be
great if we could concertedly and consistently support traffic modifications that
would improve 410 and therefore cut down on the advantage of cutting through
side neighborhoods. And also support smart growth initiatives, expansion of
efficient public transportation, and other more community-enhancing solutions.
I wanted to add this perspective to the discussion, so thanks for listening
Kathy
Adrianne Lefkowitz
Fundraising and Special Event Coordinator
Humane Society of Harford County
_www.harfordshelter.org_ (http://www.harfordshelter.org/)
410 836-1090, ext 131
euniverz at aol.com
Help Zuzu, Bandit and me raise money to help the homeless animals. Visit
_www.firstgiving.com/zuzubandit_ (http://www.firstgiving.com/zuzubandit) and
donate as we walk in Bark in the Park II!
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20070811/12204a9a/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the TownTalk
mailing list