[RP TownTalk] District Council rules are different from Planning Board rules for Cafritz testimony

[Kate Kelly]

The note below was sent to local officials by Danielle Glaros, who works
with County Council Member Eric Olson. The digest version is that at the
district council public hearing on the matter of rezoning the Cafritz
tract, new people and new testimony can be heard. Ms. Glaros did not say in
this note how to sign up or when the rezoning hearing will be. Perhaps our
elected officials or the town's administrator would be willing to supply
that information to this forum.
KK


>
>
> Friends,
>
>
> > I wanted to let you know that per correspondence with a constituent
> and Susan LaReuse yesterday we asked our attorneys to clarify the
> persons of record discussion and review the MUTC ordinance again.
> MUTC is slightly different than what even I am used to on a rezoning
> case.
>
> >
> Apparently, under MUTC regulations, if a recommendation on this case
> comes to District Council, it is required to be scheduled for a public
> hearing and certain property owners as well as municipalities are
> required to receive notification.  The public hearing will be on the
> recommendation sent by Planning Board and all parties of record as
> well as new individuals can testify.  In other words, the last formal
> record on this case is at District Council when the Public Hearing is
> held.
>
> >
> If you have any questions, please let us know. Also, Mayors/Town
> Administrators if you could please share this with your Council, I
> would appreciate it.
>
> >
> Take care,
>
> Dannielle
>
> Dannielle Glaros
> Chief of Staff
> Councilman Eric Olson
> Prince George's County
> 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
> Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
> 301-952-3060
> dmglaros at co.pg.md.us
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20120206/75397b73/attachment.html>