[RP TownTalk] District Council rules are different from Planning Board rules for Cafritz testimony

[Dannielle Glaros]

Friends,

Just to clarify further...MUTC rezoning procedures follow a slightly
different process then what most of us are used to.

Planning Board makes a rezoning recommendation which is then sent to
District Council (please note that while a recommendation has been voted
on, Planning Board still needs to finalize its order and the case has not
yet been sent to District Council).  District Council holds a public
hearing on the recommendation new testimony and new people can speak as
well as those who already provided testimony (old testimony/record will be
given to District Council for review prior to hearing).  When a date is set
and advertised, you will be able to sign up to testify.  The District
Council then makes the final recommendation on the rezoning.  Similar to
other rezoning/planning projects, the decision can be appealed to the
court.

If you have any questions, please email me at work or call, I don't always
check my gmail account.

w-301-952-3060, email: dmglaros at co.pg.md.us

Take care,
Dannielle

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Kate Kelly <mrs.ahkelly at gmail.com> wrote:

> The note below was sent to local officials by Danielle Glaros, who works
> with County Council Member Eric Olson. The digest version is that at the
> district council public hearing on the matter of rezoning the Cafritz
> tract, new people and new testimony can be heard. Ms. Glaros did not say in
> this note how to sign up or when the rezoning hearing will be. Perhaps our
> elected officials or the town's administrator would be willing to supply
> that information to this forum.
> KK
>
>
> >
> >
> > Friends,
> >
> >
> > > I wanted to let you know that per correspondence with a constituent
> > and Susan LaReuse yesterday we asked our attorneys to clarify the
> > persons of record discussion and review the MUTC ordinance again.
> > MUTC is slightly different than what even I am used to on a rezoning
> > case.
> >
> > >
> > Apparently, under MUTC regulations, if a recommendation on this case
> > comes to District Council, it is required to be scheduled for a public
> > hearing and certain property owners as well as municipalities are
> > required to receive notification.  The public hearing will be on the
> > recommendation sent by Planning Board and all parties of record as
> > well as new individuals can testify.  In other words, the last formal
> > record on this case is at District Council when the Public Hearing is
> > held.
> >
> > >
> > If you have any questions, please let us know. Also, Mayors/Town
> > Administrators if you could please share this with your Council, I
> > would appreciate it.
> >
> > >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Dannielle
> >
> > Dannielle Glaros
> > Chief of Staff
> > Councilman Eric Olson
> > Prince George's County
> > 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
> > Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
> > 301-952-3060
> > dmglaros at co.pg.md.us
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TownTalk mailing list
> To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
> TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription
> processing only
> http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
>
> For more information about Riverdale Park, visit
> http://www.riverdaleparkmd.info
>
>


-- 
Dannielle Glaros
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20120207/4db9cc63/attachment.html>