[RP TownTalk] Sunday Council Meeting Regarding Cafritz Detailed Site Plan
Jonathan W. Ebbeler
jebbeler at efusionconsulting.com
Tue May 14 23:07:40 UTC 2013
As my good friend and neighbor Herr Farrington pointed out, the PPS was
voted on Saturday, the DSP will potentially be voted on or at least
discussed on Sunday.
The M-U-TC committee voted to approve both the PPS and DSP with conditions.
Generally, the parties who have a 'say' in the PPS are the M-U-TC committee,
the municipality where the land is located (town of Riverdale Park), and the
Planning Board (M-N-C-PPC). Appeals of the Planning Board decisions go
directly to the Circuit Court (not County Council sitting as the District
Council). The process flowchart may be found here:
http://www.pgplanning.org/Assets/Planning/Development+Review/Subdivision-Pre
liminary+Plan+Chart.pdf
Generally, the parties who have a 'say' in the DSP are the M-U-TC committee,
the municipality where the land is located (town of Riverdale Park), the
Planning Board (M-N-C-PPC), and the County Council sitting as the District
Council. Appeals of the District Council are filed with the Circuit Court.
For the DSP, it was reviewed by the M-U-TC committee that transfers its
referral to the Town Council and the Planning Board, the Town Council and
Mayor will take vote on a position and transfer that to the Planning Board
and District Council. The Planning Board takes a vote (potentially on
5/23), after 30 days the District Council can take up the matter for final
say. The process flowchart may be found here:
http://www.pgplanning.org/Assets/Planning/Development+Review/Conceptual+and+
Detailed+Site+Plan+Chart.pdf
If anyone has been reading the Patch today, there was many postings on the
fact that UP voted against the PPS. While I disagree with their vote on a
factual level, especially in light of the fact that the County Council just
approved a Special Tax District for the property, thus establishing a clear
funding mechanism, it is certainly their right to do so. That being said,
it is instructive to note that the legal impact to the PPS is de minimis -
since the land is not in their municipal borders it does not trigger any
special consideration.
JWE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20130514/b9756c30/attachment.html>
More information about the TownTalk
mailing list