[RP TownTalk] Attempt to Repeal Town Crier Code
David Hiles
hilesd at mindspring.com
Fri Dec 2 04:17:07 UTC 2005
"We do not fund anything that we don't control."
Frank Erwin 1971
It is great to live in a town with a lively political culture. Let's
not muzzle it.
The issue of who controls the printing press comes up when people have
divergent views from the ruling group and worry about being edited out
of existence. People want the chance to hear both sides. Others know
that they may not always be part of the "in" group. I don't like being
told to trust those in power. That doesn't always work out too good.
Chapter 3 tries to establish the Town Crier as a impartial carrier of
local news, albeit one that devotes lots of space to current office
holders, without a mechanism for systematically including the opinions
of the outs. I liked the return of the letters section, which had some
potential in that area. When I thought about weakening the
independence of the editor, I considered whether or not I would like
the results if various sainted/devilish past mayors had a controlled
Crier or an independent Crier. We were starting to see an independent
Crier over the last six months and we were getting some great stuff.
An independent Crier with a strong editor is in the best interests of
our community.
For an example of the struggle against gov't control of an independent
paper, see the article at the following link.
http://www.godwinslaw.org/weblog/archive/2005/03/25/elect-the-daily-
texan-editor
WE are who we have been waiting for.
http://riverdalepark.blogspot.com/
More information about the TownTalk
mailing list