[RP TownTalk] Cafritz/Calvert Tract proposal meeting/approval

[Alan K. Thompson]

Sarah is correct -- under the "Tax Increment Financing" weve been
discussing, a portion of the increased revenues from the development would
pay for part of the bridge.  This and much more will be discussed at the
meeting tonight.

Alan

On Monday, January 9, 2012, Lou King <lking at knob.com> wrote:
> That is the way I read Archer's comment too Sarah, but that's me.
>
> I did notice that the Post article mention the Cafritz's "blitz" and the
"grass-roots" campaign apposed. By not mentioning that there are Riverdale
Park/UP/CP residents that favor the development, the article could be read
as just a corporate vs the little guy situation. Like most single news
sources, a fully balanced picture is often the victim of space and rush to
deadline.
>
> Lou
> O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop HTML mail - www.asciiribbon.org
>
> Sarah Wayland wrote, On 1/9/2012 11:57 AM:
>>
>> I read that as saying that the tax increment fund would only be on
>> revenue generated by the development.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TownTalk mailing list
> To post to the list, send mail to TownTalk at riverdale-park.org
> TownTalk-request at riverdale-park.org is for automated subscription
processing only
> http://riverdale-park.org/mailman/listinfo/towntalk
>
> For more information about Riverdale Park, visit
http://www.riverdaleparkmd.info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://riverdale-park.org/pipermail/towntalk/attachments/20120109/e6fe7ac9/attachment.html>